Look, it has pockets!
A public petition for the clothing industry

Look, it has pockets!

It's what every woman says when a dress finally does. It's time to stop treating functional pockets like a bonus. We're collecting signatures to deliver to the brands that make our clothes, and asking them to sew pockets that actually work.

A phone, in a pocket. A revolutionary idea.

0% smaller — the average women's front pocket, compared to men's
0% of women's jeans can fully hold a smartphone
0% of women's pockets even fit a woman's hand
The facts

The numbers, since everyone keeps asking.

In 2018, The Pudding measured the front pockets of 80 pairs of jeans from 20 major brands, every pair a 32-inch waist, so the same size person. The results were not a design choice. They were a policy.

0%

Nearly half the size

Women's front pockets average 5.6 inches deep. Men's: 9.1. On jeans that fit the same waist.

0%

Can't hold a phone

Only 40% of women's jeans studied could fit a smartphone. Every single pair of men's jeans could. Every single one.

0%

Not even a hand

Only 10% of women's front pockets could fit a woman's hand. Not the phone. Not the wallet. The hand.

Source: Jan Diehm & Amber Thomas, “Women's Pockets are Inferior”, The Pudding, 2018. It still holds up.

A short history

Once, women had the bigger pockets.

This isn't a conspiracy. It's a series of fashion decisions, made over a few hundred years, that we're asking someone to undo.

1600s–1700s. Women had the bigger pockets.

Tie-on pockets, tied around the waist and hidden under petticoats, could hold coins, letters, keys and even snacks! More storage than most men's clothing of the day offered.

1800s. Fashion went thin. The handbag was born.

Slim, high-waisted gowns left no room for hidden pockets. Women began carrying small bags called reticules, and from there the handbag industry quickly became one of fashion's biggest businesses.

c. 1910. The suffragette suit.

Practical suits with real, functional pockets became a uniform of the movement. Turns out pockets were always political and we've just forgotten.

1954. The line that became policy.

“Men have pockets to keep things in, women for decoration.”

— Christian Dior. The fashion industry appears to have taken it as instruction.

Today. A $23.5 billion reason.

The luxury handbag market is enormous and a free useful pocket is its fiercest competitor. That's a business reason for small pockets, not a design reason.

The ask

It's not a big list.

Pockets that hold a phone.

It fits. All the way in. You can sit down, and it stays.

Pockets that hold keys.

So the door, the car, and the office never become a one-person search party.

Pockets that hold a hand.

For the cold, or the thinking, or just standing somewhere without a bag.

We're not asking for cargo pants. Just a seam.

The petition

Thirty seconds. Then a delivery.

At 50,000 signatures, we bring this list to the companies that make our clothes. First name is enough, Email and comments are optional!

2 of 50,000 signatures
Real names, delivered by hand 0%

Your name stays with us. Email is used only for milestone updates, after all we're campaigning about pockets, not newsletters.

To the brands

We're bringing the list to you.

Here's who receives 50,000 signatures the day we cross the line.

50K

50,000 signatures, one envelope, a very clear message.

Levi's H&M Zara Uniqlo Ralph Lauren Theory Everlane Anthropologie Target

If you make clothing for women and you'd like to be the first brand to respond, you know where to reach us. We'll be here.

Questions, answered

Fair questions.

Why 50,000 signatures?
It's a number a company can't wave away and supporters can actually reach. When we get there, we'll deliver the list and ask each brand for a public response. If it feels small later, we'll raise the bar.
Is my email required?
No. We'd like it, so we can tell you when we hit milestones and when the delivery happens, but the petition is complete with just your first name!
What happens to my name?
It goes into a spreadsheet that only the people running this see. It is never sold, never used for anything else, and it only leaves our hands as part of the delivered petition at 50,000 signatures.
Does this kind of thing actually work?
It does when the numbers are real, the targets are named, and the press can see the delivery coming. That's exactly what this is set up to do, by the same playbook as the campaigns that pushed brands to change sourcing, packaging, and sizing policies.
Which companies will you contact?
The list above is subject to change, but a mix of the brands that make our jeans, pants, suits, and dresses; from fast fashion to workwear to denim. We welcome any suggestions!
Can I share this?
Please. That's the whole plan! Send it to someone who's ever said “look, it has pockets”, or even someone who hasn't.
Sign the petition